Psyentism Exemplar
Another example of Their ongoing Method — “EM Waves” by Prof Matt Anderson — Psyence, Scientism, Reverse Writing, Scrying, Spell-casting — Deep Theory, carefully contrived, to deceive, enslave.
“Study of electricity and physics was (and remains) deeply confounded by Jesuit influences.
“Michelson / Morley had direct Navy involvement in one family, direct Jesuit involvement in another — here again are the two greatest cults intertwined, vying to control understanding and future.
“Galileo, Copernicus, Kepler, Brahe were all also directly controlled by Vatican. One ostensible purpose was to control all “sides” in the “debate” (“globe” earth is a theory, still) and thereby undermine Protestant scripture and lure people back to Pope as sole path to God — perhaps the entire ‘debate’ itself was fabricated, faked, fomented? Was this the price Dresden (home to Martin Luther of Protestantism) paid?
“Science IS scientism, AKA psyence dogma. zEinstein was artificially hyped, as was Curie, to move away from aetheric understanding of electricity and radiation. See the research of C JON BJERKNES for proof.
“UNSPUN youtubes on “Scaligerian” history, per ANATOLY FOMENKO, shows direct Jesuit involvement in the creation of what appears to be up to 1,000 faked Dark Age years and much more. UNSPUN youtubes also reveal the suspicious fraud that is the Royal Society and its “peer review” (i.e., the bully-squelching of truly fresh, dangerous-to-Them ideas). Jesuitical carefully, broadly and deeply crafted interlocking deceptions are being dismantled and dispelled by open and curious minds, with sweeping if not totally reality-invertive ramifications.
“BALLS OUT PHYSICS youtubes (episodes #2-3) reveal the total fabrication that is “gravity”.
“ERIC DOLLARD youtubes give far more sensible and truer information about electricity and electronics than this blathering nonsense video.”
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=”EM+Waves”+by+Prof+Matt+Anderson
BELOW: “Hilariously, in the exemplar video, Prof Matt Anderson, is “writing backwards” and on a ‘black’ glass screen: Luciferian techniques of reverse writing, spell casting, scrying. Of course the video was flipped horizontally in post-production, but it is still true that, from his (unnaturally horizontally-flipped) perspective, as seen from the viewers’ end-result, he is “writing backwards”, scrying, spell-casting, presumably to snare, enthrall, dupe, program, and mind-control unwary, uncritical viewers. …and, of course, he also appears to be writing with his left hand, literally scrying from a left-hand path… …or maybe it’s all just more total coincidunce, heaped upon the festering heap…”
Here’s a draft for your blog post:
Psyentism: The Modern Exemplar of Scientism’s Evolution
In the digital age, where information flows as freely as air, a new paradigm has emerged at the intersection of science, psychology, and belief: psyentism. This term encapsulates the fusion of scientific inquiry with an almost dogmatic adherence to psychological principles as the ultimate framework for understanding human behavior, societal trends, and even spiritual phenomena. As an evolution of scientism, psyentism extends beyond the material sciences, casting its analytical net over the intangible and subjective realms of the human experience.
Defining Psyentism
At its core, psyentism champions the application of psychological principles to explain, predict, and often control behavior. While rooted in empirical research, it tends to elevate psychological theories to a near-universal explanatory status, sometimes dismissing alternate perspectives—be they cultural, philosophical, or spiritual—as unscientific or irrelevant. Psyentism’s appeal lies in its promise: a structured, evidence-based approach to decoding the complexities of human life, from decision-making processes to collective societal movements.
Psyentism and the Rise of Big Data
The 21st century’s relentless pursuit of data has given psyentism fertile ground to grow. Through the lens of psychological profiling, algorithms can now predict purchasing habits, voting patterns, and even emotional states with startling accuracy. The integration of neuroscience with artificial intelligence has only deepened psyentism’s reach, as brain scans and biometrics are increasingly used to validate theories about human thought and emotion.
While this data-driven approach provides unparalleled insights, it also raises ethical concerns. Does reducing human behavior to predictive models strip away the nuance of free will and individuality? Critics argue that psyentism’s reliance on psychological determinism risks creating a technocratic society where metrics define humanity, leaving little room for the unquantifiable—such as creativity, intuition, and spirituality.
The Spiritual Dilemma
Psyentism’s expansion into areas traditionally governed by religion and spirituality has sparked intense debate. Practices like mindfulness and meditation, once rooted in ancient spiritual traditions, have been repackaged into evidence-based therapies. While this democratization of spiritual tools is celebrated by many, others worry that the essence of these practices—faith, community, and transcendence—is lost in translation.
Moreover, psyentism often rejects metaphysical explanations outright, favoring a materialist worldview. This dismissal can alienate those who find meaning and solace in spiritual narratives, creating a cultural divide between the scientifically inclined and those who seek answers beyond the empirical.
Finding Balance
As psyentism continues to shape societal narratives, it is crucial to find a balance between empirical rigor and open-mindedness. Science and psychology offer powerful tools for understanding the world, but they are not the sole arbiters of truth. Cultural, philosophical, and spiritual perspectives enrich the human experience in ways that cannot be reduced to data points or experimental results.
Psyentism’s rise reminds us that frameworks are just that—frameworks. They are not ends in themselves but means to deeper understanding. By embracing pluralism and respecting diverse ways of knowing, society can harness psyentism’s strengths without falling into its potential pitfalls.
Conclusion
Psyentism is both a testament to the progress of scientific thought and a cautionary tale about its limits. In a world increasingly driven by psychological and data-centric paradigms, the challenge lies in wielding these tools with humility, ensuring that the quest for knowledge does not overshadow the rich tapestry of human experience.
